Headway Capital Sues Boca DME Connections and Owner Over Alleged Loan Default

by | Dec 19, 2025 · 10:53 am | Boca Raton Lawsuits, Boca Raton Archive | 0 comments

Headway Capital Sues Boca DME Connections and Owner Over Alleged Loan Default

Let's Be Friends

Support Boca Post by following us on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and Nextdoor for trusted local news, events, weather updates, and important community information delivered as it happens.

BOCA RATON, FL (Boca Post) (Copyright © 2025) — A commercial lending dispute has landed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, where Headway Capital, LLC is suing a Boca Raton business and its owner over an alleged loan default.

The case, Headway Capital, LLC v. Boca DME Connections LLC and Mischma E. Polynice, Case No. 502025CA013140XXXAMB, was filed December 18, 2025, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County.

According to the civil complaint, Headway Capital alleges that Boca DME Connections LLC entered into a Business-Use Line of Credit and Security Agreement on or about June 11, 2024. The agreement provided the company with a revolving line of credit for working capital. How much was initially available is defined in the contract itself, which is attached to the filing.

At the same time, the lender claims, Mischma E. Polynice executed a personal guaranty tied to the line of credit. Under that guaranty, Polynice allegedly agreed to personally and unconditionally guarantee the company’s payment and performance obligations if the business failed to pay.

The complaint states that Boca DME Connections received funds advanced under the line of credit. It also alleges the company later defaulted by failing to make payments as required under the agreement. Headway Capital says it made demand for payment, but the default was not cured.

Still unpaid, according to the lender.

Court records show Headway Capital claims it accelerated the debt on July 14, 2025. As of that date, the lender alleges the defendants owed a principal balance of $41,909.41, along with $14,696.96 in accrued interest calculated through July 14, 2025. The lawsuit also seeks pre-judgment interest beginning July 15, 2025, plus statutory post-judgment interest if a judgment is entered.

The complaint lays out three counts.

Count I alleges breach of contract against Boca DME Connections LLC. Headway Capital claims the company failed to make required payments under the business line of credit and is liable for the unpaid principal, interest, and additional interest allowed by law.

Count II alleges breach of guaranty against Polynice. The lender claims the guarantor failed to cure the business’s default and is personally liable for the same amounts allegedly owed under the credit agreement.

Count III seeks recovery of attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. Headway Capital cites provisions in the line of credit agreement that allegedly require the borrower and guarantor to pay the lender’s legal expenses incurred in enforcing the contract and guaranty.

Headway Capital is asking the court to enter judgment against both defendants, jointly and severally. The lender seeks the full principal balance, accrued interest, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees, and court costs, along with any other relief the court finds appropriate.

The case was filed with the Palm Beach County Clerk of Court and assigned to the circuit civil division. No response from Boca DME Connections LLC or Polynice had been filed as of the date shown in the complaint.

It’s a paper case for now.

As with all civil lawsuits, the allegations outlined in the complaint have not been proven. The defendants will have the opportunity to respond and present defenses in court.

The original document, as filed with the Palm Beach County Clerk of Court, can be viewed here.

Learn more about contract or business disputes.

Right of Response

Boca Post reports on court filings and legal proceedings based on publicly available records. Allegations contained in a civil complaint are claims made by the plaintiff and have not been proven in court.

Individuals or businesses mentioned in coverage who wish to provide additional context, clarification, or an official statement for publication may request the opportunity to publish a Right of Response.

Requests are reviewed by our editorial team before publication.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More News

Tate Brothers Sue X In Palm Beach County To Unmask Anonymous Accounts In Defamation Case

Tate Brothers Sue X in Palm Beach County to Unmask Anonymous Accounts in Defamation Case

Andrew and Tristan Tate filed a Palm Beach County civil complaint seeking an order requiring X to disclose subscriber information for anonymous accounts they claim defamed them.

Broken Sound Club Faces Boca Raton Premises Liability Lawsuit Over Alleged Trip-And-Fall

Broken Sound Club Faces Boca Raton Premises Liability Lawsuit Over Alleged Trip-and-Fall

A newly filed Palm Beach County lawsuit alleges a Boca Raton woman was injured after tripping on an improperly installed lobby rug at Broken Sound Club.

West Palm Beach Couple Sues Sansone Over Alleged Ac Leak Fall Inside Home

West Palm Beach Couple Sues Sansone Over Alleged AC Leak Fall Inside Home

A Palm Beach County civil complaint alleges a West Palm Beach woman was injured after slipping on water from an air conditioning unit that the plaintiffs say Sansone was contracted to inspect, service, maintain, and prevent from leaking.

Boca Raton Man Arrested After Undercover Mdma Buy In Town Center Area - Jordan Guy Vallagi

Boca Raton Man Arrested After Undercover MDMA Buy in Town Center Area

A Boca Raton man is facing multiple felony charges after police say he sold MDMA to an undercover detective near the Town Center area and later attempted to destroy evidence during his arrest.

Two Major Ballot Questions Face Boca Raton Voters In March 10 Municipal Election

Two Major Ballot Questions Face Boca Raton Voters In March 10 Municipal Election

Boca Raton voters will decide two major ballot questions in the March 10 municipal election involving a new police headquarters and the proposed Downtown Campus redevelopment plan.